Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Marine Partaud Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibert vs Partaud analysis and find out who is favored!
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Marine Partaud Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gibert 1 - 0 Partaud
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibert has won 47.19% of points on their second serve, while Partaud has won 40.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibert, in recent form, has won 55.59% of their opponent's second serve points, while Partaud has won 49.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.7% and 34.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibert has saved 65.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Partaud has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibert has won 50% of matches played (W/L 12/ 12), with Partaud winning 33.33% (W/L 9/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 167/ 89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12). Partaud has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 239/ 184), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 22/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Partaud has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 9/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gibert winning 1 times and Partaud being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gibert winning 2 and Partaud winning 0. The last match between Gibert and Partaud was at the W25 Essen, 28-05-2019, First, Clay with Paula Badosa Gibert getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gibert and Partaud have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gibert winning 0 times and Partaud 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gibert winning 0, and Partaud 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibert has played against opponents with an average rank of 203.5 while Partaud has played against players with an average rank of 213.7.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibert has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Partaud has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibert has converted 44.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Partaud has converted 31.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
118
Rank
2
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
850
Rank
371
High
29
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
64% (347-196)
Career Total W/L
54% (310-264)
50% (11-11)
YTD W/L
33% (4-8)
$5,050,999
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Paula Badosa Gibert vs Marine Partaud For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gibert VS Partaud
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Marine Partaud |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:0 | 1:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (31/49) | 67% (35/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (18/31) | 49% (17/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (12/18) | 29% (5/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (30/52) | 39% (19/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Marine Partaud
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Marine Partaud |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (11/11) | 33% (4/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (28/26) | 31% (8/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (254/249) | 44% (102/131) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 30% (3/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 111 | 26 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:30 | 1:15:35 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 217.41 | 89.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1021/1716) | 63% (338/540) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (666/1021) | 50% (168/338) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (328/695) | 40% (81/202) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (81/181) | 32% (20/63) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (684/1623) | 40% (219/547) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (4/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 33% (4/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 56% (9/5) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 44% (9/4) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 46% (13/6) | 20% (10/2) |
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Katie Boulter
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
38%
(
38 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
28 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Emma Navarro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Mirra Andreeva
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
41 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(4) 4-6 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
4
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Marine Partaud Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Melany Solange Krywoj
Player
Marine Partaud
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Marine Partaud
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Jose Portillo Ramirez
Player
Marine Partaud
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Melany Solange Krywoj
Player
Marine Partaud
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-3 10-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Maribella Zamarripa
Player
Marine Partaud
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
83%
(
55 of
66)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Marine Partaud
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marine Partaud
Player
Ashton Bowers
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
14
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
14 of
45)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
49%
(
50 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Marine Partaud
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gibert Vs Partaud Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gibert are available here and Partaud photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
